Payments Developer Guide

This section describes how to use this guide and where to find further information.
Audience and Purpose
This guide is written for application developers who want to use the
REST API
to integrate payment card processing into an order management system.
Implementing the
Cybersource
payment services requires software development skills. You must write code that uses the API request and response fields to integrate the payment card services into your existing order management system.
Conventions
These statements appear in this document:
IMPORTANT
An
Important
statement contains information essential to successfully completing a task or learning a concept.
WARNING
A
Warning
contains information or instructions, which, if not heeded, can result in a security risk, irreversible loss of data, or significant cost in time or revenue or both.
Related Documentation
Visit the
Cybersource
documentation hub
to find additional processor-specific versions of this guide and additional technical documentation.
Customer Support
For support information about any service, visit the Support Center:

Recent Revisions to This Document

26.09.01

Transaction Timeout Guidance
Added guidance for transaction timeouts. See Transaction Timeout Guidance.

26.05.01

This revision contains only editorial changes and no technical updates.

26.04.01

Added related reference information (Related to this Page) to applicable topics.

26.02.01

Test Cards
Added UATP test card numbers. See Test Card Numbers.

26.01.02

This revision contains only editorial changes and no technical updates.

26.01.01

This revision contains only editorial changes and no technical updates.

Introduction to Payments

This introduction provides the basic information that you need to successfully process payment transactions. It also provides an overview of the payments industry and provides workflows for each process.
With
Cybersource
payment services, you can process payment cards (tokenized or non-tokenized), digital payments such as Apple Pay and Google Pay, and customer ID transactions. You can process payments across the globe and across multiple channels with scalability and security.
Cybersource
supports a large number of payment cards and offers a wide choice of gateways and financial institutions, all through one connection.
Visit the
Cybersource
documentation hub
to find additional processor-specific versions of this guide and additional technical documentation.

Financial Institutions and Payment Networks

Financial institutions and payment networks enable payment services to function. These entities work together to complete the full payment cycle.

Merchant Financial Institutions (Acquirers)

A merchant financial institution, also known as an
acquirer
, offers accounts to businesses that accept payments. Before you can accept payments, you must have a merchant account from an acquirer. Your merchant account must be configured to process card-not-present or mail-order/telephone-order (MOTO) transactions.
Each acquirer has connections to a limited number of payment processors. You must choose a payment processor that your acquirer supports.
You can expect to pay these fees:
  • Discount rates: your acquirer charges a fee and collects a percentage of every transaction. The combination of the fee and the percentage is called the
    discount rate
    . These charges can be
    bundled
    (combined into a single charge) or
    unbundled
    (charged separately).
  • Interchange fees: payment networks, such as Visa or Mastercard, each have a base fee, called the
    interchange fee
    , for each type of transaction. Your acquirer and processor can show you ways to reduce this fee.
  • Chargebacks: when cardholders dispute charges, you can incur
    chargebacks
    . A chargeback occurs when a charge on a customer’s account is reversed. Your acquirer removes the money from your account and could charge you a fee for processing the chargeback.
Take these precautions to prevent chargebacks:
  • Use accurate merchant descriptors so that customers can recognize the transactions on their statements.
  • Provide good customer support.
  • Ensure rapid problem resolution.
  • Maintain a high level of customer satisfaction.
  • Minimize fraudulent transactions.
If excessive chargebacks or fraudulent changes occur, these actions might be taken:
  • You might be required to change your business processes to reduce the number chargebacks, fraud, or both.
  • Your acquiring institution might increase your discount rate.
  • Your acquiring institution might revoke your merchant account.
Contact your sales representative for information about products that can help prevent fraud.

Customer Financial Institutions (Issuers)

A customer financial institution, also known as an
issuer
, provides payment cards to and underwrites lines of credit for their customers. The issuer provides monthly statements and collects payments. The issuer must follow the rules of the payment card companies to which they belong.

Payment Networks

Payment networks manage communications between acquirers and issuing banks. They also develop industry standards, support their brands, and establish fees for acquiring institutions.
Some payment networks, such as Visa and Mastercard, are trade associations that do not issue cards. Issuers are members of these associations, and they issue cards under license from the association.
Other networks, such as Discover
and American Express
, issue their own cards. Before you process cards from these companies, you must sign agreements with them.

Payment Processors

Payment processors connect with acquirers. Before you can accept payments, you must register with
a payment processor
.
An acquirer might require you to use a payment processor with an existing relationship with the acquirer.
Your payment processor
assigns one or more merchant ID to your business. These unique codes identify your business during payment transactions.
This table lists the processors and corresponding card types that are supported for payment services.
IMPORTANT
Only the card types explicitly listed here are supported.
Payment Processor and Supported Card Types
Payment Processor
Supported Card Types
Notes
UATP
UATP

Card Types

You can process payments with these kinds of cards:
  • Credit cards
  • Debit cards
For a list of supported card types, see Payment Processors.

Credit Cards

Cardholders use credit cards to borrow money from issuing banks to pay for goods and services offered by merchants that accept credit cards.

Debit Cards

A debit card is linked to a cardholder's bank account. The funds are taken out of the customer's bank account, and the transaction is included on the customer's bank account statement. The customer does not receive a credit card bill as with a regular credit card.

Transaction Types

This topic provides information about transaction types that are supported by your processor.

Card-Not-Present Transactions

Authorizations with Card Verification Numbers

Card verification numbers (CVNs) are a required feature for the authorization service.
The CVN is printed on a payment card, and only the cardholder can access it. The CVN is used in card-not-present transactions as a verification feature. Using the CVN helps reduce the risk of fraud.
CVNs are not included in payment card track data and cannot be obtained from a card swipe, tap, or dip.
CVNs must not be stored after authorization.
IMPORTANT
In Europe, Visa mandates that you not include a CVN for mail-order transactions and not record a CVN on any physical format such as a mail-order form.

CVN Locations and Terminology

For most cards, the CVN is a three-digit number printed on the back of the card, to the right of the signature field.
For American Express, the CVN is a four-digit number printed on the front of the card above the card number.

Figure:

CVN Locations
Image depicting the location of the CVN on the back of most cards and the front
                    of an American Express card.
Each payment card company has its own name for the CVN value:
  • Mastercard calls it the
    card validation code
    (CVC2).
  • Visa calls it the
    card verification value
    (CVV2).

International Transactions

Consider compliance and merchant remittance funding when processing international transactions.

Compliance

Accepting payments from a country other than your own requires that you observe the processing rules and practices of the payment systems in that country. This list describes areas of compliance that are especially important:
  • Merchant descriptor requirements—A merchant descriptor communicates merchant information to customers to remind them of the circumstances that triggered a payment. Merchant descriptors reduce the possibility of a chargeback. Accordingly, the merchant descriptor displayed on a customer’s statement should be a close match to the name on your website. It is not good practice to consolidate multiple websites into a single merchant account and use a generic descriptor that more-or-less covers all offerings.
  • Excessive chargebacks—To prevent an excessive number of chargebacks, you must maintain good customer support, rapid problem resolution, a high level of customer satisfaction, and transaction management processes that minimize fraudulent transactions. When payment card chargebacks become excessive, you must change business processes to reduce chargebacks. If chargebacks are not reduced to a satisfactory level, your account can be terminated.

Merchant Remittance Funding

You can request that the transaction proceeds be converted to another currency. Currency conversion uses a foreign exchange rate to calculate the conversion to the requested currency. The foreign exchange rate might be explicitly stated as a rate or implicitly stated as a transaction amount. The funded amount and can vary from day to day. The foreign exchange rate might also include an increase for the foreign exchange risk, sales commissions, and handling costs.

Payment Services

Various services are involved in processing payments.
These services enable customers to purchase goods and services. They also enable merchants to receive payments from customer accounts, to provide refunds, and to void transactions.

Authorization

An authorization confirms that a payment card account holds enough funds to pay for a purchase. Authorizations can be made online or offline.

Micropayment Authorization

Micropayments are payments for less than one unit in the transaction’s currency.
Cybersource
does not support micropayment authorizations for
UATP
.

Online Authorization

Online authorizations provide immediate confirmation of funds availability. The customer's financial institution also reduces the amount of credit available in the customer's account, setting aside the authorized funds for the merchant to capture at a later time. Authorizations for most payment cards are processed online. Typically, it is safe to start fulfilling the order when you receive an authorization confirmation.
An
An online authorization confirmation and the subsequent hold on funds expire after a specific length of time. Therefore it is important to capture funds in a timely manner. The issuing bank sets the expiration time interval, but most authorizations expire within
5 to
7 days.
The issuing bank does not inform
Cybersource
when an authorization confirmation expires. By default, the authorization information for each transaction remains in the
Cybersource
database for 180 days after the authorization date. To capture an authorization that expired with the issuing bank, you can resubmit the authorization request.

Offline Authorization

Online transactions require an internet connection. In situations where the internet is not available, for example, due to an outage, merchants can continue to take credit card payments using offline transactions. An offline authorization is an authorization request for which you do not receive an immediate confirmation about the availability of funds.
Offline authorizations have a higher level of risk than online transactions because they do not confirm funds availability or set aside the funds for later capture. Further, it can take up to 5 days to receive payment confirmations for offline transactions. To mitigate this risk, merchants may choose to fulfill orders only after receiving payment confirmation.

Authorization Workflow

This image and description show the authorization workflow:
  1. The customer purchases goods or services from the merchant using a payment card.
  2. You send an authorization request over secure internet connection to
    Cybersource
    . When the customer buys a digitally delivered product or service, you can request both the authorization and the capture at the same time. When the customer buys a physically fulfilled product, do not request the capture until you ship the product.
  3. Cybersource
    validates the order information then contacts your payment processor and requests authorization.
  4. The processor sends the transaction to the payment card company, which routes it to the issuing bank for the customer's payment card. Some card companies, including Discover
    and American Express
    , act as their own issuing banks.
  5. The issuing bank approves or declines the request.
    • If funds are available, the issuing bank reserves the amount of the authorization request and returns an authorization approval to
      Cybersource
      .
    • If the issuing bank denies the request, it returns an authorization denial to
      Cybersource
      .
  6. Cybersource
    runs its own tests then tells you whether the authorization succeeded.

Sale

A sale is a bundled authorization and capture. Some processors and acquirers require a sale transaction instead of using separate authorization and capture requests. For other processors and acquirers, you can request a sale instead of a separate authorization and capture when you provide the goods or services immediately after taking an order.
There are two types of sale processing: dual-message processing and single-message processing.

Dual-Message Processing

Dual-message processing is a two-step process. The authorization is processed first. If the authorization is successful, the capture is processed immediately afterward. The response includes the authorization and the capture information. If the authorization is declined, the capture is not processed, and the response message includes only the authorization information.

Capture

A capture is a follow-on transaction to an authorization. It is used to transfer the authorized funds from the customer's account to the merchant account. To link the authorization transaction to the capture transaction, you include a request ID in your capture request. This request ID is returned to you in the authorization response.
Captures are typically not performed in real time. They are placed in a batch file and sent to the processor, and the processor settles all of the captures at one time. In most cases, these batch files are sent and processed outside of the merchant's business hours. It usually takes 2 to 4 days for the acquiring financial institution to deposit the funds into the merchant account.
When fulfilling only part of a customer’s order, do not capture the full amount of the authorization. Capture only the cost of the delivered items. When you deliver the remaining items, request a new authorization, and then capture the new authorization.
IMPORTANT
It is not possible to perform a capture if a transaction is in a review state, which can occur if you use a fraud management service. You must accept the transaction prior to capture. For more information, see the fraud management documentation in
the
Business Center
.

Capture Workflow

The capture workflow begins when you send a request for a capture.
  1. The merchant sends a request for a capture to the
    Cybersource
    gateway.
  2. For online captures,
    Cybersource
    validates the order information then sends an online capture to the payment processor.
    For offline captures,
    Cybersource
    stores the capture request in a batch file and sends the batch file to the payment processor after midnight.
  3. The processor validates the request and forwards it to the issuing bank.
  4. The issuing bank transfers funds to the acquiring bank.
IMPORTANT
The payment processor does not notify
Cybersource
that the money has been transferred. To ensure that all captures are processed correctly, you should reconcile your capture requests with the capture reports from your processor.

Refund

Refunds are payment refunds from a merchant to the cardholder after a cardholder pays for a product or service and that payment is captured by the merchant. When a refund request is successful, the issuer transfers funds from the merchant bank (acquirer) account to the customer's account. It typically takes 2 to 4 days for the acquirer to transfer funds from your merchant account.
There are two types of refunds: a
follow-on refund
that is linked to an original capture or sale, and a
stand-alone credit
that is not linked to an original capture or sale.
WARNING
You should carefully control access to your
refund and
credit services. Do not request this service directly from your customer interface. Instead, incorporate this service as part of your customer service process. This process reduces the potential for fraudulent transactions.

Follow-on Refund

Refunds, also known as
follow-on refunds
,
use the capture request ID to link the refund to the original transaction.
This request ID is returned during the capture request (also known as a
settlement
) and is used in all subsequent refunds associated with the original capture.
The request ID links the transaction to the customer’s billing and account information, so you are not required to include those fields in the
refund
request.
When you combine a request for a
refund
with a request for another service, such as the tax calculation service, you must provide the customer’s billing and account information.
Unless otherwise specified,
refunds
must be requested within 180 days of a settlement. You can request multiple follow-on
refunds
against a single capture or sale transaction as long as the total amount does not exceed the original purchase amount. To perform multiple follow-on
refunds
, use the same request ID in each request.

Stand-Alone Credits

Stand-alone credits are not connected to an original transaction. Stand-alone credits do not have a time restriction, and they can be used to issue refunds more than 180 days after a transaction settlement.

Refund and Credit Workflow

This workflow applies to follow-on credits, also known as refunds, and stand-alone credits. It begins when you send a request for a refund or credit.
Refunds and credits do not happen in real time. All of the credit requests for a day are typically placed in a file and sent to the processor as a single
batch
transaction. In most cases, the batch transaction is settled overnight.
  1. The merchant sends the refund or credit request to
    Cybersource
    .
  2. For online refunds and credits,
    Cybersource
    validates the order information then sends the request to the payment processor.
    For offline refunds and credits,
    Cybersource
    stores the request in a batch file and sends the batch file to the payment processor after midnight.
  3. The processor validates the request and forwards it to the acquiring bank.
  4. The acquiring bank transfers funds to the issuing bank.
IMPORTANT
Not all processors support stand-alone credits.

Void

A void cancels a capture or credit request that you submitted to
Cybersource
but has not already been submitted to your processor. Capture and credit requests are usually submitted to your processor once a day, so your window for successfully voiding a capture or credit request is small. A void request is declined when the capture or credit request has already been sent to the processor.
After a void is processed, you cannot credit or capture the funds. You must perform a new transaction to capture or credit the funds. Further, when you void a capture, a hold remains on the authorized funds. If you are not going to re-capture the authorization,
and if your processor supports authorization reversal after void (ARAV),
you should request an authorization reversal to release the hold on the unused funds.
A void uses the capture or credit request ID to link the transactions. The authorization request ID is used to look up the customer’s billing and account information, so there is no need to include those fields in the void request. You cannot perform a follow-on credit against a capture that has been voided.

Testing the Payment Services

To ensure that requests are processed correctly, you must test the basic success and error conditions for each service you plan to use.

Requirements for Testing

Before you can test, contact customer support to activate the credit card services and configure your account for testing. You must also contact your processor to set up your processor account.
IMPORTANT
When building your connection to the
Cybersource
payment gateway, ensure that you have implemented controls to prevent card testing or card enumeration attacks on your platform.
For more information, see the best practices guide.
When we detect suspicious transaction activity associated with your merchant ID, including a card testing or card enumeration attack,
Cybersource
reserves the right to enable fraud management tools on your behalf in order to mitigate the attack. The fraud team might also implement internal controls to mitigate attack activity. These controls block traffic that is perceived as fraudulent. Additionally, if you are using one of our fraud tools and experience a significant attack, our internal team might modify or add rules to your configuration to help prevent the attack and minimize the threat to our infrastructure. However, any actions taken by
Cybersource
would not replace the need for you to follow industry standard best practices to protect your systems, servers, and platforms.
Follow these requirements when you test your system:
  • Use your regular merchant ID.
  • Use a real combination for the city, state, and postal code.
  • Use a real combination for the area code and telephone number.
  • Use a nonexistent account and domain name for the customer’s email address.
  • REST API test endpoint:
    POST
    https://apitest.cybersource.com
    /pts/v2/payments

Test Card Numbers

Use these payment card numbers to test the authorization, capture, and credit services. Remove the spaces from the test card numbers when sending them to the test system. Do not use real payment card numbers. To test card types that are not included in the list, use an account number that is in the card’s BIN range. For best results, try each test with a different service request and with different test payment card numbers.
IMPORTANT
The test card numbers that are provided are formatted with Xs for zeroes in the card number. When testing with these card numbers, remove the spaces and replace each X with a 0 (zero).
  • American Express—3782 8224 631X XX5
  • Discover—6X11 1111 1111 1117
  • JCB—3566 1111 1111 1113
  • Maestro (International)
    • 5X33 9619 89X9 17
    • 5868 2416 0825 5333 38
  • Maestro (UK Domestic)—the issue number is not required for Maestro (UK Domestic) transactions.
    • 6759 4111 XXXX XXX8
    • 6759 56XX 45XX 5727 054
    • 5641 8211 1116 6669
  • Mastercard
    • 2222 42XX XXXX 1113
    • 2222 63XX XXXX 1125
    • 5555 5555 5555 4444
  • UATP (CVV not required)
    • 1354 1234 5678 911
    • 1485 1234 5678 9X5
  • Visa—4111 1111 1111 1111

Using Amounts to Simulate Errors

You can simulate error messages by requesting authorization, capture, or credit services with specific amounts that trigger the error messages. These triggers work only on the test server, not on the production server.
Each payment processor uses its own error messages.
For more information, see: REST API Testing Guide

Test American Express Card Verification

Before using CVN with American Express, it is strongly recommended that you follow these steps:
  1. Contact customer support to have your account configured for CVN. Until you do this, you will receive a
    1
    in the
    processorInformation.cardVerification.resultCode
    response field.
  2. Test your system in production using a small currency amount, such as one currency unit. Instead of using the test account numbers, use a real payment card account number, and send an incorrect CVN in the request for authorization. The card should be refused and the request declined.

Transaction Timeout Guidance

This topic provides guidance for handling scenarios in which a payment request submitted to
Cybersource
does not return a definitive status because of a timeout or other communication failure. It focuses on the most common timeout scenarios and describes the supported mechanisms for determining the final transaction status.
This guidance helps you minimize the operational and financial risks associated with an uncertain transaction status. It addresses two common risks: how to treat an unknown status as a failed transaction, which can result in false declines, and retrying a transaction without first validating its status, which can lead to duplicate authorizations or duplicate charges.
A timeout represents an unknown transaction status, which is not necessarily a transaction failure.

Incorrect Timeout Handling Risks

Each payment timeout creates a moment of uncertainty. How your team handles that moment determines whether it becomes a non-event, a customer complaint, a chargeback, or a lost sale. This table describes what goes wrong, the customer experience, and your business risk.
Timeout Situations
What Goes Wrong
Customer Experience
Business Risk
The timeout is misread as a failure. You retry the transaction immediately, and it is processed twice.
Customer sees two charges on their statement.
Chargeback, refund cost, trust damage, and potential dispute fees.
The timeout is misread as a failure. You present a payment-failed message, and the customer abandons checkout.
Customer believes the card was declined. The customer tries another payment method or abandons the purchase.
Lost revenue. The original payment might still be authorized on the card.
No unique transaction ID is present. As a result, duplicate detection fails and multiple authorizations occur.
Multiple holds or charges appear on the same card for one order.
Disputes, regulatory risk, and manual reconciliation overhead.
You configure the client timeout too short. As a result, you drop the connection and the transaction status is unknown.
A spinner suddenly disappears with no clear result.
Unknown order status, manual intervention, and customer contact with support.
IMPORTANT
You must systematically resolve an unknown transaction status before you take additional payment actions. Each recommendation transforms an uncertain transaction status into an additional action.

Transaction Flow and Failure Taxonomy

A single payment authorization transaction traverses multiple independent participants within the payment ecosystem. Each connection point can experience latency, communication failures, or timeout conditions.

End-to-End Authorization Flow

The transaction passes through these participants:
  1. Cardholder to Merchant:
    The cardholder initiates a payment transaction through a website, mobile application, point-of-sale system, or digital wallet.
  2. Merchant to
    Cybersource
    :
    The merchant submits the authorization request to
    Cybersource
    for routing and processing.
  3. Processor routing:
    Cybersource
    forwards the transaction to the appropriate processor.
  4. Card network routing:
    The processor routes the request through the applicable payment network.
  5. Issuer decision:
    The card issuer evaluates the transaction and returns an authorization decision.
The transaction must follow the same path in reverse to be successful. Any break in that return path leaves the transaction status unknown to the merchant. This image shows the end-to-end authorization flow:
These are the reason codes most relevant to timeout handling:
  • ESYSTEM
    :
    General system error or server-side failure. The transaction status is unknown. Do not treat as a definitive failure. Perform a status check before any retry or an authorization reversal.
  • ETIMEOUT
    :
    Server-side timeout.
    Cybersource
    received the request but could not return a response within the processing window. The transaction status is unknown. Reconcile before retrying.
  • DUPLICATE_REQUEST
    :
    Duplicate request declined.
    Cybersource
    identified the authorization as a duplicate of a previous request with the same merchant reference. Do not retry with the same reference, because the original transaction might have succeeded. Perform a status check first.

Timeout Scenarios and Recommended Actions

These are the four distinct timeout scenarios.

Scenario: Request Never Reached
Cybersource

  • Duplicate risk:
    none
  • Condition:
    The request never reached
    Cybersource
    because of a connection issue. As a result, you received no acknowledgment or response from
    Cybersource
    .
  • Recommended Action:
    After a few seconds, perform a transaction status lookup using the
    clientReferenceInformation.code
    field before you resubmit the authorization. If the lookup returns no transaction record, resubmit the original authorization request.

Scenario:
Cybersource
Internal Failure

  • Duplicate risk:
    low
  • Condition:
    Cybersource
    receives the request but cannot continue processing because a required internal service is timing out, for example Decision Manager, Token Management Service (TMS), Payer Authentication, or internal routing. Because the transaction never progresses into the downstream payment ecosystem,
    Cybersource
    does not submit an authorization to the processor, card network, or issuer.
    Example: Internal Failure Response
    HTTP Status Code:
    502
    { "id": "7871896614436518804807", "submitTimeUtc": "2026-08-20T01:34:21Z", "status": "SERVER_ERROR", "reason": "SERVICE_TIMEOUT", "message": "The request was received, but a service did not finish running in time" }
  • Recommended Actions:
    1. Retry the authorization after a delay of approximately 30 seconds to allow any internal transient issue to resolve.
    2. If the error persists, place the authorization in a delayed resubmission queue if possible.
    3. Monitor for recovery by confirming successful processing of subsequent transactions or notification that the service issue is resolved.
    4. Once recovery is confirmed, resubmit the original authorization request from the delayed resubmission queue.

Scenario: Request Received, Processor Response Took Too Long

  • Duplicate risk:
    high
  • Condition:
    Cybersource
    accepted the request and invoked the authorization request to the processor, but did not get the response within the timeout period. As a result, the transaction might already have been approved even though the final status was not returned to you.
    Example: Processor Timeout Response
    HTTP Status Code:
    502
    { "id": "7871927193766252604807", "submitTimeUtc": "2026-08-20T02:25:49Z", "status": "SERVER_ERROR", "reason": "SERVER_TIMEOUT", "message": "Error - The request was received but there was a server timeout. This error does not include timeouts between the client and the server." }
  • Recommended Actions:
    1. Retry the authorization.
    2. For the first transaction since a timeout occurred,
      Cybersource
      proactively initiates an automatic authorization reversal as a protective measure in case the original authorization was approved but the final status could not be confirmed.
    3. Perform a status lookup using the generated request
      id
      returned in the first authorization response after some time, and verify the final status of the automatic authorization reversal.
    4. If the authorization reversal status cannot be confirmed, check with the processor or contact
      Cybersource
      customer support.

Scenario: Approved, but Confirmation Never Received

  • Duplicate risk:
    highest
  • Condition:
    The authorization was approved, but you did not receive the response because of a connectivity or network issue, or because you use a short timeout window. This is the highest-risk scenario for duplicate charges.
  • Recommended Actions:
    1. If you use a short timeout and plan to retry the authorization, wait up to 60 seconds before you take further action. Perform a transaction status lookup using the original
      clientReferenceInformation.code
      to determine the status of the original authorization request. If the transaction is found and approved, record the result.
    2. If you perform a second authorization before verifying the status of the original authorization, you must reverse the original authorization. Use the merchant ID in the
      clientReferenceInformation.transactionId
      field from the original authorization request to submit an authorization reversal. Alternatively, use merchant reference code in the
      clientReferenceInformation.code
      field in transaction search to get the request ID and process the authorization reversal.
      Example: Reversal Using the Transaction ID
      Endpoint: POST /pts/v2/reversals { "clientReferenceInformation": { "transactionId": "987654321" }, "reversalInformation": { "amountDetails": { "totalAmount": "100.00", "currency": "ABC" } } }

Verifying a Transaction Status

There are three methods for determining the accurate status of a transaction before you act on a timeout.

Transaction Search API

  • When a timeout or communication failure occurs, use the REST API transaction search to determine whether the original authorization request was successfully processed.
  • Query using the request ID whenever available.
  • If the request ID is not available, query using the REST merchant reference code
    clientReferenceInformation.code
    field.
Transaction Search Best Practices
  • Use the minimum date range required to locate a transaction. Avoid broad date-range searches when checking transaction status unless there is a specific business need.
  • Do not use transaction search for high-volume or frequent status checks. This can result in rate limiting.
  • For ongoing transaction status monitoring, use the payment status API where appropriate.
  • Include only the search criteria necessary to identify the transaction.
  • When searching for multiple request IDs, use the dedicated request ID filter instead of free-text search fields.
Example: Transaction Search Request
Endpoint: POST /tss/v2/searches { "save": "false", "name": "Transaction Recovery Search", "timezone": "America/Chicago", "query": "clientReferenceInformation.code:{merchant_reference_code} AND submitTimeUtc:[NOW-1HOUR TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]", "offset": 0, "limit": 100, "sort": "id:asc,submitTimeUtc:asc" }
For the full request and response schema and a list of supported search fields, see the Transaction Search API reference.

Business Center

Use the
Business Center
when API-based verification is unavailable, or when a timeout requires closer manual review, for example investigating a customer-reported duplicate charge.
IMPORTANT
Transaction search results might not be available immediately after a transaction is submitted, because data propagation takes a few seconds.
  1. Sign in to the
    Business Center
    using your credentials.
  2. Select
    Transaction Search
    >
    Transaction Details
    .
  3. Search using the ID returned in the
    Cybersource
    response for the internal-failure and processor- timeout scenarios. For other scenarios, when there is no response from
    Cybersource
    , search using the merchant reference number, known as the
    merchant reference code
    in the API.
  4. Review the returned status, reason code, and timestamp to confirm the actual status.
  5. Apply the result exactly as an API response would be applied. Record the status, and resubmit only if no record exists.

Figure:

Searching by Request ID for a Failed Authorization
Searching by request ID returns the failed authorization for the
                    internal-failure scenario (Card Payments, Authorization,
                    Failed).

Figure:

Searching by Request ID for a Failed Authorization and Its Automatic Authorization Reversal
Searching by request ID returns both the failed authorization and the successful automatic timeout authorization reversal for the processor timeout scenario.

Figure:

Searching by Merchant Reference Number
Searching by merchant reference number, when no request ID is available, returns the successful authorization and
Decision Manager
result.

Automated Payment Status Notifications

The payment events service uses a webhook to publish automated notifications for transaction statuses to your endpoint. This reduces reliance on the original synchronous response. This is a safety net that complements, and does not replace, the transaction status verifications described in this section.
Setup
  1. Enroll in the payment events service and create a webhook subscription.
  2. Provide a secure URL that is capable of receiving inbound POST notifications in real time.
  3. Acknowledge receipt of the notification immediately and process the event data asynchronously.
Behavior
  1. You submit a transaction and the synchronous response is delayed or lost.
  2. The transaction completes on the
    Cybersource
    side, and
    Cybersource
    publishes the transaction status as a payment event.
  3. Your webhook endpoint receives the notification, including the transaction ID, merchant reference code, and final transaction status.
  4. Reconcile the event payload against your own records.
For more information about the webhooks service, see
Webhooks Developer Guide
.

Layered Timeout Model

Cybersource
follows a layered timeout model based on a monotonic timeout hierarchy, where each outer layer waits slightly longer than the layer it depends on. This ensures that when an inner component times out first,
Cybersource
receives a clear timeout response and can take appropriate action. If you reverse the timeout order, you might abandon a request that is still being processed. This creates the risk that you incorrectly treat a completed transaction as a failure and retry it.
Cybersource
determines timeout values based on observed production latency, processor performance characteristics, and operational behavior, and periodically adjusts them.
This table describes each timeout layer, typical wait times, and rationale for the each time setting.
Layer or Control
Typical Wait Time
Rationale
Merchant to
Cybersource
60 seconds or more
Your timeout should be longer than the
Cybersource
processing timeout to ensure that
Cybersource
can return a definitive response before you abandon the request.
Cybersource
internal service
5 to 10 seconds
The Payment Orchestrator uses these timeouts to call internal services such as Decision Manager and Token Management Service.
Cybersource
to processor
30 seconds
Cybersource
implements a fail-fast strategy for processor communications.
Cybersource
establishes timeout thresholds on a per-processor basis and evaluates them using processor response times, timeout rates, transaction volumes, and processor-specific operational characteristics. This approach aligns with processor guidance and enables
Cybersource
to quickly identify unreachable endpoints while minimizing unnecessary processing delays.

Retry and Duplicate Transaction Prevention

Payment timeouts and communication failures can create uncertainty about the status of a transaction. You might receive a timeout response even though the transaction was successfully processed by
Cybersource
, the processor, or the issuer. In these situations, immediately resubmitting the original request can result in duplicate authorizations, captures, or charges. Implementing retry mechanisms are therefore essential to balance transaction recovery with duplicate prevention. Before retrying a payment operation, determine the transaction status whenever possible and apply controlled retry practices to minimize the risk of duplicate processing.
To reduce this risk, use these methods:
  • Merchant reference codes to support authorization duplicate detection.
  • Transaction IDs to support timeout recovery, transaction lookups, authorization reversals, voids, and reconciliation.

Merchant Reference Code and Duplicate Transaction Detection

For authorization processing,
Cybersource
uses the
clientReferenceInformation.code
field that you provided to identify duplicate authorization requests. A duplicate authorization might be declined with reason code
104
.
For the API field description, see API Fields: Merchant Reference Code.

Enabling Block Duplicate Merchant Reference Numbers

Where the capability is supported for your configuration, you can enable your account to block duplicate merchant reference codes, also known as merchant reference numbers, rather than submitting a customer support request. This prevents duplicate authorization requests with the same merchant reference code submitted within 15 minutes of the original authorization.
Follow these configuration steps in the
Business Center
:
  1. Log in to the
    Business Center
    .
  2. Go to Template Management or Manage Merchants.
  3. Locate the
    Block Duplicate Merchant Reference Number
    setting.
  4. Set
    enableDuplicateMerchantReferenceNumberBlocking
    to
    true
    .
  5. Save and apply the configuration to the merchant profile.
You can also manage this capability programmatically through the Merchant Boarding API. For more information, see
Merchant Boarding Developer Guide

Transaction ID for Timeout Recovery and Lifecycle Management

The transaction ID in the
clientReferenceInformation.transactionId
field restricts duplicate transaction processing, locates transactions after a timeout, supports authorization reversal and void requests, and assists with reconciliation and operational investigations. Unlike the merchant reference code, which is used primarily for authorization duplicate detection, the transaction ID remains associated with the transaction throughout its lifecycle and recovery processes.
The transaction ID applies to:
  • Authorization
  • Credit
  • Refund
  • Sale
For the API field description, see
Cybersource
API Fields reference: Transaction ID
.
IMPORTANT
This capability is broadly available across most payment processors, except these processors:
  • AIBMS
  • Barclays
  • Cielo
  • Comercio Latino
  • Elavon
  • FDC Compass
  • FDC Nashville Global
  • Fiserv RapidConnect
  • HSBC
  • LloydsTSB Cardnet
  • Moneris
  • Lloyds-OmniPay
  • Rede
  • Worldpay VAP

Client Retry Backoff

When a request fails because of a temporary network or service issue, avoid immediately resubmitting the same request multiple times. Instead, space retry attempts with progressively longer delays between each attempt. This approach helps reduce pressure on downstream systems during periods of degraded performance, allows them time to recover, and helps prevent additional load that could worsen the disruption.
A typical retry backoff strategy includes:
  • Initial delay:
    Wait a short period before the first retry attempt.
  • Increasing delays:
    Increase the wait time between successive retries rather than retrying at a fixed interval.
  • Maximum delay:
    Limit the maximum wait time between retries to avoid excessively long delays.
  • Randomized timing (jitter):
    Introduce small random variations in retry timing to prevent large numbers of clients from retrying simultaneously.
  • Retry limits:
    Cap the number of retry attempts or the overall retry duration before escalating to status validation, reconciliation, or operational review.
Use retry backoff only for transient failures where a subsequent attempt might succeed. When the status of a payment transaction is unknown, determine the final transaction status before submitting another payment request.

Reversal Strategy and Recovery Failure Handling

When the status of a payment transaction cannot be fully determined, the objective is to prevent duplicate charges while ensuring that the final transaction status is accurately resolved. This happens in two stages: first, choosing and executing the correct recovery action for the original transaction; second, recognizing that the recovery action itself is a network operation subject to the same failures, and handling that possibility the same way.

Select the Correct Recovery Method

Each recovery method applies to a specific point in the transaction lifecycle:
  • Authorization reversal
    releases an approved authorization that has not yet been captured.
  • Void
    cancels a transaction that exists but has not yet been submitted for settlement.
  • Refund
    returns funds for a transaction that has already been captured or settled.

Consider the Transaction Lifecycle

Base your recovery choice on the current transaction lifecycle stage:
  • If the transaction is authorized but not captured, an authorization reversal is typically appropriate.
  • If the transaction is captured but not yet settled, a void might be supported.
  • If the transaction has been settled, a refund is required.

Confirm Transaction Status Before Reversing

Follow these steps before you reverse a transaction:
  1. Determine whether the original transaction was processed.
  2. Confirm the current transaction status.
  3. Execute the appropriate recovery action.
  4. Verify that the recovery action completed successfully.

Cybersource
Automatic Authorization Reversal

For supported processor integrations,
Cybersource
might automatically submit an authorization reversal when the authorization status cannot be determined because of issuer, network, or processor communication failures.
IMPORTANT
When a timeout occurs,
Cybersource
designs recovery mechanisms to preserve Level II and Level III and currency-related transaction data, reducing the risk of interchange impacts caused by incomplete or lost transaction attributes. You must include Level II and Level III fields on the original authorization request so that this data is available in case of an automatic authorization reversal.

When the Status of an Authorization Reversal or Void Request Is Unknown

When the status of a recovery operation is unknown because of a timeout or communication failure, validate the transaction status using the original transaction ID and merchant reference code before taking additional action.
This lookup is read-only against
Cybersource
transaction records and does not require resubmission of the original payment request.
Authorization Reversal or Void
Cybersource
permits only one successful authorization reversal or void per transaction, so a retried request produces one of these results:
  • If
    Cybersource
    accepts a retried authorization reversal or void request, it did not successfully process the original authorization or void.
  • If
    Cybersource
    rejects a retried authorization reversal or void request because the transaction has already been reversed or voided, it already successfully processed the original authorization reversal or void and correctly prevented the duplicate request.
  • In this scenario, no additional authorization reversal or void action is required.
Refund
Refund processing requires additional care to avoid supporting multiple refunds against the same captured transaction. Consider these points:
  • Unlike authorization reversals and voids, a successfully processed refund does not prevent a subsequent refund from being submitted.
  • Therefore, when the status of a refund request is unknown, validate the transaction status before submitting another refund.
  • Failure to perform a status check might result in an unintended duplicate refund.
  • If a duplicate refund is identified before settlement, you might be able to void the refund, subject to processor capabilities and settlement timing.

Reconciliation Sweep

The reconciliation sweep process acts as the final safety net for transactions that cannot be conclusively resolved through online recovery mechanisms. Reconcile
Cybersource
records against authorization, capture, reversal, refund, and settlement records using available correlation data such as merchant reference number, transaction ID, amount, currency, and available payment reference values.
Identify unresolved transactions, duplicate processing activity, and recovery operations in which the transaction status cannot be confirmed. Based on the transaction status and processor capabilities, perform one of these actions:
  • Initiate an automated late recovery action where permitted.
  • Route unresolved cases to an operational review queue for manual investigation and resolution.
Reconciliation provides the final confirmation of transaction status and serves as the last line of defense against unresolved duplicates, failed recovery actions, and communication failures.

Recommended Approach

Cybersource
recommends pairing bounded, status-checked retries with an automated reconciliation sweep against settlement. This combination catches lost authorization s without requiring manual intervention. Retrying alone, without a reconciliation process behind it, leaves genuinely charged but unresolved cases unaddressed.

Preventing Queue Cascades and System Overload

Correct handling of individual transaction timeouts is only part of a resilient payment architecture. Under sustained latency or downstream service degradation, requests can accumulate across multiple layers.

Cybersource
Controls

Cybersource
protects its system stability with bounded queues and connection pools, circuit breakers that pause traffic to a struggling downstream dependency and resume it only after recovery, and load shedding that returns
HTTP 429
or
HTTP 503
with
Retry-After
guidance rather than accepting more work than it can handle. Each response indicates whether an operation is safe to retry, and
Cybersource
is set up to avoid a request to hold a processing resource beyond its allocated timeout.

Your Controls

Apply these controls on your side:
  • Implement bounded queues and connection pools for all payment traffic.
  • Use circuit breakers to protect your applications from
    Cybersource
    slowdowns.
  • Respect
    Retry-After
    and other retry guidance.
  • Apply exponential backoff with jitter to all retry operations.
  • Cap concurrent in-flight requests during degraded operating conditions.
  • Move recovery workflows to asynchronous processing queues rather than user-facing request threads.

Avoiding the Asymmetric Recovery Trap

Apply these safeguards:
  • Rate limit recovery operations.
  • Control retry traffic independently from new transaction traffic.
  • Bound background recovery queue throughput.
  • Prioritize correctness over speed in recovery processing.
IMPORTANT
The objective is not to retry failed transactions indefinitely. The objective is to maintain system stability while enabling safe recovery through controlled retries, reconciliation, and recovery workflows.

Exception Handling Recommendations

These tables provide detailed, transaction-type-specific guidance for handling exceptions, timeouts, and recovery scenarios during authorization, capture, authorization reversal or void, and credit or refund processing. They are operational reference material intended for engineering, support, and operations teams who are resolving live exceptions.
Authorizations
Scenario
Expected Behavior
Recommended Actions
The authorization request never reaches
Cybersource
because of a network, Domain Name System (DNS), or Transport Layer Security (TLS) failure.
No transaction record is created at
Cybersource
. No downstream authorization is submitted.
Confirm that the failure is client-side. Wait for connectivity. Perform a status lookup to confirm no record exists. Retry safely using the same transaction ID.
A
Cybersource
internal dependency fails (
Decision Manager
,
Token Management Service
, or payer authentication).
A hard decline is returned immediately. The transaction never reaches the processor, network, or issuer.
No status check is needed, because the transaction status is known. Verify the failed dependency, then resubmit with the same transaction ID.
A timeout occurs before the processor, network, or issuer responds.
Cybersource
returns
151
or
ETIMEOUT
. The status is unknown. An automatic authorization reversal might be triggered.
Do not retry immediately. Wait for the
Cybersource
processing window. Perform a status lookup through the transaction search API. Reconcile if unresolved.
The authorization is approved by the issuer, but the response is lost.
The authorization exists and is valid on the card, but you never received confirmation. The status is already known and approved. No automatic authorization reversal condition applies here because automatic authorization reversal addresses the case where the status is unknown to
Cybersource
.
Do not resubmit. Perform a status lookup using the original transaction ID. Record the result after you confirm it.
The authorization is declined by the issuer, but the response is lost.
No charge exists. This is a safe end-state, but you are unaware.
Perform a status lookup to confirm the decline. Once confirmed, it is safe to request an alternate payment method.
You submitted a duplicate authorization before the original is resolved.
Two authorizations might exist on the card simultaneously.
Verify the duplicate transaction using a transaction ID or merchant reference code match. Reverse the duplicate transaction, never the original.
The automatic authorization reversal confirmation is lost.
The reversal might have succeeded or failed at the processor. The status is unknown to
Cybersource
and you.
Apply the recovery pattern described earlier in this topic: validate the transaction status on the reversal itself, then submit the transaction for reconciliation to determine its final status.
Captures
Scenario
Expected Behavior
Recommended Actions
The capture request never reaches
Cybersource
.
No capture record is created. The authorization remains open or uncaptured.
Confirm the client-side failure. Perform a status lookup. If no record exists, retry with the same transaction ID.
The capture times out downstream.
The settlement status is unknown. The authorization might or might not have been captured.
Do not retry immediately. Perform a status lookup. Confirm using the settlement report if still unresolved. Reconcile.
The capture succeeds, but confirmation is lost.
Funds are captured. Only the response is missing.
A status lookup confirms the captured state. Record the result. No retry or authorization reversal is needed.
The capture fails because the authorization expired or the amount mismatched, and the response is lost.
A real decline occurred, but you see only a timeout.
A status lookup reveals the true decline reason. Address the root cause before you resubmit.
The authorization is approved, but the capture timed out.
This is an ambiguous state. The authorization is valid, but the capture status is unconfirmed.
Treat as approved but unsettled. It might settle or reverse depending on the downstream status. Verify using the settlement report, then choose retry-capture or reverse-authorization.
The capture is retried without a status check.
There is a risk of duplicate capture, or double billing, on the customer's card.
Always perform a status check before you retry. If a duplicate occurs, refund or void only the later capture.
The capture succeeds, but the settlement report shows a later discrepancy.
The settlement record is different from the status you expected.
Route to the reconciliation sweep. Match on the merchant ID, amount, currency, and card reference.
Authorization Reversals and Voids
Scenario
Expected Behavior
Recommended Actions
The reversal or void request never reaches
Cybersource
.
No reversal record is created. The original authorization remains active and open.
Confirm that the failure is client-side. Perform a status lookup on the reversal. If no record exists, resubmit the reversal using the same transaction IDs.
The reversal times out downstream (processor, network, or issuer).
The status of the reversal is unknown. The original authorization might or might not have been released.
Do not retry immediately. Perform a status lookup through the transaction search API on the reversal itself. Reconcile, if unresolved.
The reversal succeeds, but confirmation is lost.
The authorization was successfully released. Only the response is missing.
A status lookup confirms the release. Record the result. No further action is needed.
The reversal fails because you already captured or settled the transaction, or the authorization expired, and the response is lost.
The reversal was rejected outright, a real decline of the reversal itself, but you see only a timeout.
A status lookup reveals the true rejection reason. If the transaction has since settled, use refund or credit instead of a reversal.
You retry the reversal without a status check.
There is a risk of a duplicate reversal attempt against the same authorization.
Always perform a status check before you retry.
An automatic authorization reversal is already in progress when you submitted a manual reversal.
Two reversal attempts, one automatic and one manual, might race against the same authorization.
Confirm the automatic authorization reversal status before you submit a manual reversal. Avoid duplicate reversal attempts on the same authorization.
You cannot confirm the reversal status after the recovery window.
This is a genuinely unresolved state, with a risk that the authorization remains held on the cardholder's account indefinitely.
Submit the transaction for reconciliation to determine its final status. If still unresolved, route to a manual operational review.
Refunds
Scenario
Expected Behavior
Recommended Actions
The refund request never reaches
Cybersource
.
No refund record is created. The settled transaction remains unrefunded.
Confirm that the failure is client-side. Perform a status lookup. If no record exists, retry the refund using the same transaction ID.
The refund times out downstream.
The refund status is unknown. It is unclear whether funds were returned to the cardholder.
Do not retry immediately. Perform a status lookup. Confirm using the settlement report if unresolved. Reconcile.
The refund succeeds, but confirmation is lost.
Funds were returned. Only the response is missing.
A status lookup confirms the refunded state. Record the result. No further refund is needed.
The refund fails because it was already refunded or the amount exceeds the captured amount, and the response is lost.
A real decline occurred, such as a duplicate or over-limit refund attempt, but you see only a timeout.
A status lookup reveals the true decline reason before you attempt any further recovery action.
The refund is retried without a status check.
There is a risk of a duplicate refund, with funds returned to the cardholder twice.
Always perform a status check before you retry, using the same refund reference.

Your Integration Responsibilities

This checklist defines your responsibilities for timeout handling. Use it as a verification checklist during implementation reviews, quality assurance sign-off, and go-live assessments:
  • Set the client read timeout to 60 seconds or more, allowing sufficient time for
    Cybersource
    to return a definitive response before you terminate the request.
  • Assign a unique merchant reference code in the
    clientReferenceInformation.code
    field to each transaction and use that reference consistently for transaction processing, status validation, recovery activities, and reconciliation to support end-to-end traceability.
  • On an unknown status, use the transaction search API and reporting or reconciliation data to determine the final transaction status before submitting another payment request. Avoid immediate resubmission and apply controlled retries with increased delays between attempts. Honor the
    Retry-After
    reason code and other retry guidance provided by
    Cybersource
    .
  • When a duplicate is identified, reverse the duplicate, not the original. Select void versus refund based on the current transaction lifecycle state. Confirm the charge exists before reversing.
  • Implement appropriate resiliency controls, such as bounded concurrency, request throttling, circuit breakers, or asynchronous recovery processing, to prevent recovery activities from affecting customer-facing transaction flows.
  • Treat reason codes
    151
    ,
    ETIMEOUT
    , and
    267
    (deferred or pending timeout) as unknown, never as a definite failure or a definite success.

Best Practices

Always verify the transaction status through the Transaction Search API or the Business Center before you retry, reverse, or communicate the transaction status to the customer. If you identify duplicate transactions, apply an authorization reversal to the duplicate transaction.
  • Timeout events can occur because different participants in the payment ecosystem use different timeout values.
  • Do not resubmit a transaction after a timeout without first searching or assessing the potential cause.
  • Perform a transaction search to determine the actual status.
  • Based on the search results, reverse duplicate transactions if you identify multiple successful transactions, and take no action if the transaction was completed successfully and no duplicate exists.

Standard Payment Processing

This section shows you how to process various authorization, capture, credit, and sales transactions.

Basic Authorization

This section provides the information you need in order to process a basic authorization.
All supported card types can process authorizations.

Endpoint

Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments

Declined Authorization

If an authorization is declined, you can use response categories to help you decide whether to retry or block a declined transaction. These response fields provide additional information:
  • paymentInsightsInformation.responseInsights.category
  • paymentInsightsInformation.responseInsights.categoryCode
Category codes have possible values (such as
01
) each of which corresponds to a category that contains a description.
You cannot retry this category code and category:
  • 01 ISSUER_WILL_NEVER_APPROVE
For these values, you can retry the transaction a maximum of 15 times over a period of 30 days:
  • 02 ISSUER_CANNOT_APPROVE_AT_THIS_TIME
  • 03 ISSUER_CANNOT_APPROVE_WITH_THESE_DETAILS
    : Data quality issue. Revalidate data prior to retrying the transaction.
  • 04 GENERIC_ERROR
  • 97 PAYMENT_INSIGHTS_INTERNAL_ERROR
  • 98 OTHERS
  • 99 PAYMENT_INSIGHTS_RESPONSE_CATEGORY_MATCH_NOT_FOUND

REST Example: Processing a Basic Authorization

Request
{ "orderInformation": { "billTo": { "country": "US", "lastName": "Kim", "address1": "201 S. Division St.", "postalCode": "48104-2201", "locality": "Ann Arbor", "administrativeArea": "MI", "firstName": "Kyong-Jin", "email": "" }, "amountDetails": { "totalAmount": "100.00", "currency": "usd" } }, "paymentInformation": { "card": { "expirationYear": "2031", "number": "4111111111111111", "expirationMonth": "12", "type": "001" } } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "_links" : { "authReversal" : { "method" : "POST", "href" : "/pts/v2/payments/6461731521426399003473/reversals" }, "self" : { "method" : "GET", "href" : "/pts/v2/payments/6461731521426399003473" }, "capture" : { "method" : "POST", "href" : "/pts/v2/payments/6461731521426399003473/captures" } }, "clientReferenceInformation" : { "code" : "1646173152047" }, "id" : "6461731521426399003473", "orderInformation" : { "amountDetails" : { "authorizedAmount" : "100.00", "currency" : "usd" } }, "paymentAccountInformation" : { "card" : { "type" : "001" } }, "paymentInformation" : { "tokenizedCard" : { "type" : "001" }, "card" : { "type" : "001" } }, "paymentInsightsInformation" : { "responseInsights" : { "categoryCode" : "01" } }, "processorInformation" : { "systemTraceAuditNumber" : "862481", "approvalCode" : "831000", "merchantAdvice" : { "code" : "01", "codeRaw" : "M001" }, "responseDetails" : "ABC", "networkTransactionId" : "016153570198200", "consumerAuthenticationResponse" : { "code" : "2", "codeRaw" : "2" }, "transactionId" : "016153570198200", "responseCode" : "00", "avs" : { "code" : "Y", "codeRaw" : "Y" } }, "reconciliationId" : "6461731521426399003473", "status" : "AUTHORIZED", "submitTimeUtc" : "2022-03-01T22:19:12Z" }
Response to a Declined Request
{ "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "TC50171_3" }, "errorInformation": { "reason": "PROCESSOR_ERROR", "message": "Invalid account" }, "id": "6583553837826789303954",
"paymentInsightsInformation": { "responseInsights": { "categoryCode": "01", "category": "ISSUER_WILL_NEVER_APPROVE" } },
"pointOfSaleInformation": { "amexCapnData": "1009S0600100" }, "processorInformation": { "systemTraceAuditNumber": "004544", "merchantNumber": "1231231222", "networkTransactionId": "431736869536459", "transactionId": "431736869536459", "responseCode": "111", "avs": { "code": "Y", "codeRaw": "Y" } }, "status": "DECLINED" }

Authorization with Line Items

This section shows you how to process an authorization with line items.
The main difference between a basic authorization and an authorization that includes line items is that the
orderInformation.amountDetails.totalAmount
field, which is included in a basic authorization, is substituted with one or more line items that are included in
a
lineItem[]
array
.

Fields Specific to this Use Case

These
fields
are required for each line item that you use:
orderInformation.lineItems[].unitPrice
orderInformation.lineItems[].quantity
orderInformation.lineItems[].productCode
orderInformation.lineItems[].productSku
Optional when
item_#_productCode
is set to
default
,
shipping_only
,
handling_only
, or
shipping_and_handling
orderInformation.lineItems[].productName
Optional when
item_#_productCode
is set to
default
,
shipping_only
,
handling_only
, or
shipping_and_handling
At a minimum, you must include the
orderInformation.lineItems[].unitPrice
field in order to include a line item in an authorization. When this field is the only field included in the authorization, the system sets:
  • orderInformation.lineItems[].productCode
    :
    default
  • orderInformation.lineItems[].quantity
    :
    1
For example, these three line items are valid.
"orderInformation": { "lineItems": [ { "unitPrice": "10.00" }, { "unitPrice": "5.99", "quantity": "3", "productCode": "shipping_only" }, { "unitPrice": "29.99", "quantity": "3", "productCode": "electronic_good", "productSku": "12384569", "productName": "receiver" } ] }

Endpoint

Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments

REST Example: Processing an Authorization with Line Items

Request
{ "currencyConversion": { "indicator": "Y" }, "paymentInformation": { "card": { "number": "4111111111111111", "expirationMonth": "12", "expirationYear": "2031" } }, "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "currency": "USD", "exchangeRate": ".91", "originalAmount": "107.33", "originalCurrency": "eur" }, "billTo": { "firstName": "John", "lastName": "Doe", "address1": "1 Market St", "locality": "san francisco", "administrativeArea": "CA", "postalCode": "94105", "country": "US", "email": "" }, "lineItems": [ { "unitPrice": "10.00" }, { "unitPrice": "5.99", "quantity": "3", "productCode": "shipping_only" }, { "unitPrice": "29.99", "quantity": "3", "productCode": "electronic_good", "productSku": "12384569", "productName": "receiver" } ] } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "_links": { "authReversal": { "method": "POST", "href": "/pts/v2/payments/6482385519226028804003/reversals" }, "self": { "method": "GET", "href": "/pts/v2/payments/6482385519226028804003" }, "capture": { "method": "POST", "href": "/pts/v2/payments/6482385519226028804003/captures" } }, "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "1648238551902" }, "id": "6482385519226028804003", "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "authorizedAmount": "117.94", "currency": "USD" } }, "paymentAccountInformation": { "card": { "type": "001" } }, "paymentInformation": { "tokenizedCard": { "type": "001" }, "card": { "type": "001" } }, "processorInformation": { "systemTraceAuditNumber": "191521", "approvalCode": "831000", "merchantAdvice": { "code": "01", "codeRaw": "M001" }, "responseDetails": "ABC", "networkTransactionId": "016153570198200", "consumerAuthenticationResponse": { "code": "2", "codeRaw": "2" }, "transactionId": "016153570198200", "responseCode": "00", "avs": { "code": "Y", "codeRaw": "Y" } }, "reconciliationId": "6482385519226028804003", "status": "AUTHORIZED", "submitTimeUtc": "2022-03-25T20:02:32Z" }

Sale

This section provides the information you need in order to process a sale transaction.
A sale combines an authorization and a capture into a single transaction.

Endpoint

Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments

REST Example: Sale

Request
{ "processingInformation": { "capture": true }, "orderInformation" : { "billTo" : { "country" : "US", "lastName" : "VDP", "address1" : "201 S. Division St.", "postalCode" : "48104-2201", "locality" : "Ann Arbor", "administrativeArea" : "MI", "firstName" : "RTS", "email" : "" }, "amountDetails" : { "totalAmount" : "100.00", "currency" : "usd" } }, "paymentInformation" : { "card" : { "expirationYear" : "2031", "number" : "4111111111111111", "expirationMonth" : "12", "type" : "001 } } }
Response to a Successful Request
Most processors do not return all of the fields that are shown in this example.
{ "_links" : { "void" : { "method" : "POST", "href" : "/pts/v2/payments/6485004068966546103093/voids" }, "self" : { "method" : "GET", "href" : "/pts/v2/payments/6485004068966546103093" } }, "clientReferenceInformation" : { "code" : "RTS-Auth" }, "id" : "6485004068966546103093", "orderInformation" : { "amountDetails" : { "totalAmount" : "100.00", "authorizedAmount" : "100.00", "currency" : "usd" } }, "paymentAccountInformation" : { "card" : { "type" : "001" } }, "paymentInformation" : { "tokenizedCard" : { "type" : "001" }, "card" : { "type" : "001" } }, "processorInformation" : { "systemTraceAuditNumber" : "841109", "approvalCode" : "831000", "merchantAdvice" : { "code" : "01", "codeRaw" : "M001" }, "responseDetails" : "ABC", "networkTransactionId" : "016153570198200", "retrievalReferenceNumber" : "208720841109", "consumerAuthenticationResponse" : { "code" : "2", "codeRaw" : "2" }, "transactionId" : "016153570198200", "responseCode" : "00", "avs" : { "code" : "Y", "codeRaw" : "Y" } }, "reconciliationId" : "6485004068966546103093", "status" : "AUTHORIZED", "submitTimeUtc" : "2022-03-28T20:46:47Z" }

Capture

This section describes how to capture an authorized transaction.

Endpoint

Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments/
{id}
/captures
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments/
{id}
/captures
The
{id}
is the transaction ID returned in the authorization response.

Required Fields for Capturing an Authorization

This field value maps from the original authorization, sale, or credit transaction.

REST Example: Capturing an Authorization

Request
{ "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "ABC123" }, "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "totalAmount": "100.00", "currency": "EUR" } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "_links": { "void": { "method": "POST", "href": "/pts/v2/captures/6662994431376681303954/voids" }, "self": { "method": "GET", "href": "/pts/v2/captures/6662994431376681303954" } }, "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "1666299443215" }, "id": "6662994431376681303954", "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "totalAmount": "100.00", "currency": "EUR" } }, "reconciliationId": "66535942B9CGT52U", "status": "PENDING", "submitTimeUtc": "2022-10-20T20:57:23Z" }

Follow-On
Refund

This section provides the information you need in order to process a follow-on
refund
, which is linked to a capture or sale. You must request a follow-on
refund
within 180 days of the authorization or sale.

Endpoint

Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments/
{id}
/refunds
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/payments/
{id}
/refunds
The
{id}
is the transaction ID returned in the capture or sale response.

REST Example: Processing a Refund

Request
{ "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "totalAmount": "100.00", "currency": "EUR" } } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "_links": { "void": { "method": "POST", "href": "/pts/v2/credits/6699964581696622603955/voids" }, "self": { "method": "GET", "href": "/pts/v2/credits/6699964581696622603955" } }, "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "1669996458298" }, "creditAmountDetails": { "currency": "eur", "creditAmount": "100.00" }, "id": "6699964581696622603955", "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "currency": "EUR" } }, "paymentAccountInformation": { "card": { "type": "001" } }, "paymentInformation": { "tokenizedCard": { "type": "001" }, "card": { "type": "001" } }, "processorInformation": { "approvalCode": "888888", "networkTransactionId": "016153570198200", "responseCode": "100" }, "reconciliationId": "61873329OAILG3Q6", "status": "PENDING", "submitTimeUtc": "2022-12-02T15:54:18Z" }

Stand-Alone Credit

This section shows you how to process a credit, which is not linked to a capture or sale. There is no time limit for requesting a credit.

Endpoint

Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/credits/
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/credits/

REST Example: Processing a Stand-Alone Credit

Request
{ "orderInformation" : { "billTo" : { "country" : "US", "lastName" : "Kim", "address1" : "201 S. Division St.", "postalCode" : "48104-2201", "locality" : "Ann Arbor", "administrativeArea" : "MI", "firstName" : "Kyong-Jin", "email" : "" }, "amountDetails" : { "totalAmount" : "100.00", "currency" : "eur" } }, "paymentInformation" : { "card" : { "expirationYear" : "2031", "number" : "4111111111111111", "expirationMonth" : "12" } } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "_links": { "void": { "method": "POST", "href": "/pts/v2/credits/6663069906146706403954/voids" }, "self": { "method": "GET", "href": "/pts/v2/credits/6663069906146706403954" } }, "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "1666306990717" }, "creditAmountDetails": { "currency": "eur", "creditAmount": "100.00" }, "id": "6663069906146706403954", "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "currency": "eur" } }, "paymentAccountInformation": { "card": { "type": "001" } }, "paymentInformation": { "tokenizedCard": { "type": "001" }, "card": { "type": "001" } }, "processorInformation": { "approvalCode": "888888", "networkTransactionId": "016153570198200", "responseCode": "100" }, "reconciliationId": "66490108K9CLFJPN", "status": "PENDING", "submitTimeUtc": "2022-10-20T23:03:10Z" }

Void a Payment

This section describes how to void a payment that was submitted but not yet processed by the processor. A payment is also known as a sale, which is an authorization and capture in one API request. Include the payment ID in the void request endpoint to cancel the payment.

Required Fields for Voiding a Payment

REST Example: Voiding a Payment

Request
{ "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "123456789012" } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "submitTimeUtc": "2025-03-11T16:39:30Z", "processorInformation": { "approvalCode": "OK1272", "responseCode": "000" }, "consumerAuthenticationResponse": { "systemTraceAuditNumber": "500036" }, "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "authorizedAmount": "110.00" } }, "message": "Successful transaction.", "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "123456789012" }, "reconciliationId": "000000050000771", "id": "7417111702443232235535", "_links": { "self": { "method": "GET", "href": "/pts/v2/voids/7417111702443232235535" } }, "status": "VOIDED" }

Void for a Capture or Credit

This section describes how to void a capture or credit that was submitted but not yet processed by the processor.

Endpoints

Void a Capture
Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/captures/
{id}
/voids
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/captures/
{id}
/voids
Void a Credit
Production:
POST
https://api.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/credits/
{id}
/voids
Test:
POST
https://apitest.cybersource.com
/pts/v2/credits/
{id}
/voids
The
{id}
is the transaction ID returned during the credit response.

Required Fields for Voiding a Capture or Credit

Including this field is recommended, but not required.

REST Example: Voiding a Capture or Credit

Request
{ "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "test123" } }
Response to a Successful Request
{ "_links": { "self": { "method": "GET", "href": "/pts/v2/voids/6541933390746728203005" } }, "clientReferenceInformation": { "code": "1654193339056" }, "id": "6541933390746728203005", "orderInformation": { "amountDetails": { "currency": "USD" } }, "status": "VOIDED", "submitTimeUtc": "2022-06-02T18:08:59Z", "voidAmountDetails": { "currency": "usd", "voidAmount": "100.00" } }